Calder & Lane
(DIGITAL WORKPLACE)

We get everyone on one page.

If you pay for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, you already own most of the tools. What is missing is one channel to keep track of, meetings that start on time, phones that work from anywhere, and a bill for only the seats in use.

(THE PAIN)

Everyone has the tools. Nobody can find anything.

Where did I see that? In chat, in mail, or in a meeting six months ago. Someone asks again, and no combination of keywords brings it back, because nobody can figure out what word to search for.

The file is in OneDrive and in SharePoint and attached to a chat, and none of the three is the latest. It feels like you need a certification to use it.

The leaders believe it is handled. The front line got a login and no training.

The hybrid meeting is held together by last-minute workarounds, and the hybrid work technology in the room, the screen and the microphone, eats the first minutes.

It gets messy very easily. The notification you needed was missed, and the message you needed is buried under the ones you did not.

(WHAT WE DO)

The tool, the rules, and the training.

Whether you are looking for a Microsoft 365 consultant or help with Google Workspace, the first job is the same. We help you settle on one platform instead of half of each.

There is no universal search tool, even if you are using exclusively Microsoft products, so the fix is fewer places to look and a rule for which one to open.

None of it is built by us. The provider's engineers, from the Microsoft partner, the Google partner or the phone carrier, do the configuring and the migrating. Our job is to learn how your business runs first, bring the right engineers from more than one provider into the same conversation, help you choose, and stay at the table while the one you chose does the work.

  • Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, chosen around how your work actually moves, with the Google Workspace migration planned with the provider's engineers if you need to change.
  • Microsoft Teams chat and meetings, with the provider's engineer asked to make guest access work with your clients before the first one is invited.
  • Phones on Microsoft Teams Phone or a UCaaS provider, chosen by how your calls queue and what the contract says.
  • Meeting rooms the installer has run a real meeting from, in the room and on the screen, so they work the same way every time.
  • Working rules your team writes, short enough for one page, with us asking the questions that keep it short.
  • Training from the provider in short sessions inside the real work, starting with the people who said they would never use it.
  • A license review, the invoice beside the sign-in report, the reason written next to every seat, and you choose what stays.
(THE ROLLOUT)

How the change sticks.

It is how you use it, and we agree. The tool still has to be the right one, and then the rules and the training carry most of the job. Adoption is the first thing we look at.

So before anyone buys anything new, we ask for the sign-in report on the collaboration tools you already pay for and read it. What good looks like is plain: everything in one tool, one place for the file, and things resolve faster.

The change runs like this.

  1. We ask the front line what slows them down, and we ask the leaders the same question. The two answers are usually different, and the gap between them is the first thing on the list.
  2. You pick one channel with us and stick with it. Your team writes the rule on one page, with us asking the questions: chat for now, email for outside, files in one library, decisions in one place.
  3. The provider's engineers switch the extra places off or make them read-only, so the count of places goes down.
  4. The people who said no come first. What sounds like refusal is often a request for a reason and a lesson, so we listen to the reason, and the provider's trainer gives the lesson at their desk, on their own files.
  5. On the weekly call after the switch, we ask who is using it and where it stalls, and the rule that stalled gets rewritten. Then we open the license bill.
(PHONES AND ROOMS)

Phones that ring where people are.

Once you get past porting the main number, the use is fairly simple. The hard part is everything before that, and the contract after it, so that is where we spend our time.

That holds whether you land on Microsoft Teams Phone or a separate UCaaS provider, the unified communications services that bundle phones, meetings and messages.

  • The pitchporting is easy. What happens: porting the main number is the hard part, so we ask the carrier to schedule it last and keep the old line live until the new one answers, and we stay on that call.
  • The pitchset up in a day. What happens: a full week and days on the phone with support, and still no working integration, so the menu and the ring groups get written down with you before the switch date, and the carrier's engineers build them from that page instead of from a support call.
  • The pitchone flat price. What happens: a three-year auto-renewal and a mid-term price rise are in the contract more often than not, so we read it before you sign, and you know the renewal date and the cost of leaving before you are in.
  • The pitchthe numbers just work. What happens: the new numbers can show up as spam on your customers' screens, and desk phones can drop calls, so we ask the carrier to test both and show you the result before your customers find out.
  • The pitchthe room is plug and play. What happens: the screen fails one day and the sound the next, so we ask the installer to run a real meeting with you from the room and from a laptop before the first client joins, and to put in writing who comes back when it fails.
(FOR THE IT MANAGER)

When the cloud is down, they blame you.

If you run IT for a firm that is bigger than its IT team, you know how it goes. The vendor reports the outage and the users blame you instead, and your support ticket goes to someone whose chances of helping are next to zero.

Features appear without warning, and the admin center is sprawling. Things get moved just to move them.

You keep your seat, and so does the IT company you use. We take the reading and the planning off your desk, and we put our name beside yours.

  • When Microsoft or Google is down, we escalate with your provider on your behalf and give you a plain read of what they are saying, so you can tell your users and the blame lands where it belongs.
  • When a feature appears or a setting moves, you get a plain read of what it means for you on the weekly call, and the right engineer at the provider is asked which setting to shut before it becomes a loophole.
  • A plain record of the settings you chose and why, kept in your name, so finding one no longer means a search and a documentation tab open beside the admin center.
  • Both names on the plan, yours and ours, with one owner and one deadline on every line.
  • The same person at our end the whole way, so a question from you does not turn into a ticket.
  • Admin rights sit with you from day one, every change the provider makes lives in your tenant, and nothing depends on a login only we hold.
(THE BILL)

Pay for the seats people sit in.

The bill grows one seat at a time. A plan for a person who left, an app nobody opens, a top tier bought for one feature three people use.

Outrageously expensive, and staggering next to the hardware IT could buy instead. The bill is for the plan you were sold, and that plan is bigger than the one you use.

You do not want to be squeezed into the middle option to get one feature, and you are tired of the constant budget justification. So we put the invoice next to the sign-in records and match every seat to a person and a plan.

Some seats go down a level and some go away, and the tool the team likes stays.

The plans go on the table with the reason written next to every seat, and you choose. The record of what was cut and why stays with you, in your name.

We check again before every renewal, because seats drift back.

(What usually goes wrong)

We have seen this before.

  1. Three copies of the plan, and nobody sure which is current.
  2. Every hybrid meeting opens with "can you hear me" and a call to IT.
  3. A main number stuck in porting while customers get voicemail.
  4. A phone contract that renewed for three years without a conversation.
  5. An app nobody opens, billed per seat, every month.
  6. A new hub that became one more place to look.
(Straight answers)

Questions people ask about this.

All the straight answers

Is this a tool problem or a people problem, and why bring in an advisor for that?

Mostly a people problem. It is how you use it, and we agree, and we still start by asking whether the tool is the right one, because rules and training on the wrong tool do not hold. After that the rules and the training carry most of the job. We look at adoption first, and if most of the seats you already pay for sit empty, buying another app is the wrong move and we say so. What an advisor adds is the questions you would not know to ask the provider, and someone at the table whose only job is to help you choose.

Should we move from Google Workspace to Microsoft 365, or the other way?

Only if the reason is bigger than the pain of moving. Google is so hard to shake, and Microsoft products take some time to learn, especially coming from Google, because the cost is in habits and file formats. If your clients live in Word and Excel and your team spends its days fixing formatting, a move can pay. If your team is happy and the gaps are small, we say stay and fix the gaps. If you do move, the Google Workspace migration is planned with the provider's engineers around your quiet weeks, we ask them to keep the old system readable until you have checked the last file, and we are at the table for all of it.

Can we run our phones through Teams?

Yes, and sometimes you should not, and we will tell you which. Microsoft Teams Phone suits a team that already lives in Teams all day. A separate UCaaS service can be cheaper or better for a front desk or a call queue. Either way the hard parts are porting the main number and the contract term, so more than one quote goes on the table with the contract terms beside each, we read them before you sign and plan the port with you and the carrier before anyone talks about features, and you choose.

Some of our staff refuse anything but phone and email. What then?

Then we do not start with the tool. The line is usually some version of: if you cannot talk to me on the phone and you cannot send me the information by email, we have nothing to discuss. That is a fair place to start, and leaving it there has a cost too: chains of twenty emails arranging one meeting because some refuse the chat. So those people come first, and email stays for what email is good at. The rules get written at the desk with the people who will follow them, the provider's training is short and happens inside their real work, and if a rule does not stick after a few weekly calls, the rule changes.

Will this just be one more place to look?

No, and the way to be sure is to count. Every attempt to centralize information in some better repository has just resulted in fragmentation, and a new hub on top of the old hubs leaves everyone with one more tab. So we work the other way around. One channel to keep track of, one home for files, and the old places go dark or go read-only. Count the places to look before and after, and the second number should be smaller.

Is this a one-time project, or do you stay?

Either, and you choose. Microsoft and Google keep moving settings and adding features, so the weekly call can keep going after the switch: the same person, what changed, what it means for you, and the renewal dates watched. If you want the project only, it ends when the switch is done, the record stays with you in your name, and you can pick the phone up again later.

Our IT company already looks after the tenant. Where does that leave you?

Alongside them. If you already have an outside IT company or an in-house person, they stay, and they stay on the tickets and the day to day work. The reading and the planning come to us, the rules get written by your team with our questions, and the training comes from the provider. The plan names who does each line, so the work does not fall between two chairs.

(Get a second opinion)

Send over the invoice or the phone quote.

Forward the license invoice with the seats nobody uses, or the phone quote with the three-year term in it. Two business days later at most, a senior person who has read it is on a call with you for thirty minutes on where we would start and where it usually stalls. The call is free and nothing is for sale on it, and nobody calls you afterward unless you ask.

Get a second opinion